A Choice between Probable Futures

Anyone who has undertaken even a cursory survey of the exciting new field of DNA activation is to likely to have remarked that while the myriad techniques for stimulating our latent genetic potential all agree that this can be done, there is wide-ranging disagreement over what actually occurs when the genome is stimulated. Nowhere is this disagreement more apparent than in the number of DNA strands said to be inherent in human genetic potential.

Whether this potenial involves creating additional strands of DNA, as many believe, or merely actualizing the unused portions of so-called “junk” DNA (which I propose renaming potential DNA), is arguably of small importance. What is of great significance is that humanity finds itself in an era of global transformation of consciousness–one that occurs by way of DNA “upgrades” that rewire our relationship to time and space and empower our personal metaphors to become real as we discover truth in paradox. Intellectual resistance to this new unifying, “both-and” perception is a sign of the times.

One issue that contributes greatly to confusion when discussing multi-stranded DNA is the terminology. Unless we understand that the strands being referenced are actually rungs on a single molecule, it is difficult to begin to see how the DNA molecule might mutate into another molecule altogether. Scientifically, only two DNA strands or rungs are admitted to exist. This is the classic “double helix” referenced in biology texts, a single twisted ribbon with one side acting as a “backup” carbon copy of the other “active” side.

Rumors of a third DNA strand, many centering on a behind-closed-doors meeting of geneticists in Mexico City in 1995, have been circulating for years. Spectacular as these rumors may sound, they are anecdotally supported by reports that Watson and Crick, DNA's “discoverers,” found additional protein material alongside the existing double helix as far back as the 1950s, leading some to speak of “evolutionary debris” in a manner reminiscent of mainstream genetics' dismissal of “junk” DNA–a move now increasingly acknowledged even by many scientists as an historic oversight.

The generally accepted notion that DNA in its present form is a universal molecule actually finds little support when we examine the activity of DNA itself. DNA is continuously changing, mutating. To claim that it is impossible for DNA to morph into another molecule represents, I contend, an empiricist bias based on so-called immutable facts (that the DNA molecule has been around a long time in more or less the same configuration, for instance) which, in the end, are called into question by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and the logic-defying realization that we create our reality by observing it.

To focus solely on DNA as a biochemical phenomenon, as mainstream genetic science does, is in essence to put the cart before the horse. In a profound sense DNA is the result of Spirit's descent into matter. Behind the DNA molecule exists a template of energy or consciousness that directs the formation of organisms at the level of DNA. Change this energy template, alter this consciousness, and we potentially transform organic expression. The inability of science to cure many very curable diseases through the biochemical route is proof negative that biochemistry is merely the tip of the iceberg of being. On the other hand, the ability of DNA activation to address many of these very same conditions–noninvasively–points us in a direction of great promise.

Moreover, if it is indeed true that a transformation is occurring not only in human consciousness but in universal consciousness, as many ancient wisdom traditions maintain for our historical moment, then such a microcosmic change in our genetic program would in theory be supported by the change occurring in the macrocosm. Of course, the opposite is also true, since the hermetic principle “As Above, So Below” can, and must, be read the other way as well: “So Below, As Above.”

In the theoretical case of radical genetic (trans)mutation from two to three rungs, we are still looking at a single molecule of life. There is simply (or not so simply) the addition of a third rung requiring a reconfiguring of the manner in which base pairs of nucleotides attach to the rungs. This might occur through a large-scale rearrangement of transposons, or “jumping” DNA, that comprise the bulk of potential DNA. Biologist Colm Kelleher, in a fascinating article entitled “Retrotransposons as Engines of Human Bodily Transformation,” calls such a massive molecular rearrangement a transposition burst, and theorizes that the lightbody comes about in such an instantaneous metamorphosis.

As for the name DNA, perhaps, as the Brazilian mystic Triguerinho wrote years ago, we need new nomenclature–maybe TNA for trioxyribonucleic acid in the above example, or something of the sort. In Joy Riding the Universe, a fascinating book whose concepts are coherent and compelling enough to have been studied by scientists that provocatively examines mitochondrial DNA and genetic transfiguration, gifted intuitive savante Sheradon Bryce calls the third DNA rung a “self-worth rung.” She theorizes that this movement away from a binary to a trinary genetic code is capable of helping us achieve god-realization as we learn simultaneously to source and mold our own creations.

In DNA activation circles, the number of strands said potentially to exist in humans ranges from the low end of three to–somewhat comically–the hundreds and even thousands. There is at times a sort of one-upmanship among proponents of DNA activation, which is hardly surprising in a global capitalistic society where “more is better.” We rarely ever stop to think whether this assumption as to the superiority of numbers is true or just … a cultural assumption. Fortunately, evolution is not a sports contest and no one is keeping score.

Those of us who have been studying the subject of DNA activation and conscious evolution have undoubtedly come across the “12” principle more often than not. Perhaps most famously, the notion of twelve DNA strands serves as the foundation for Barbara Marciniak's provocative channelings (Bringers of the Dawn, Family of Light) underpinned by a “Pleiadean” cosmology. I deeply appreciate Marciniak and other Pleiadean sources, whose writings were highly inspirational to the development of my own work in DNA activation. One often has the impression in this field of standing on the shoulders of giants, and that is as it should be.

From the time I began my in-depth study of DNA activation some years ago, however, I suspected that twelve was not the only story to be told about the evolution of our species. In a nutshell, I felt, and continue to feel, that twelve is part of a holographic principle–a multidimensional one as opposed to a much greater “transdimensional” REALITY to which it is possible to have access. While it is true, in other words, that our holographic universe is in many ways structured on twelve, this does necessarily imply that as we evolve into the fullness of our being we must remain in this twelve-based universal system.

I was often reminded, reading the various accounts of twelve DNA strands, of another story I once heard a famous shaman tell of journeying astrally and coming upon somebody sitting in bliss in a higher dimension. Although this person seated in the lotus position had found his way to a higher dimension, much in the way so-called Ascended Masters are typically described, he definitely had not made it back “home” to Source. In other words, although he failed to realize the fact, he was still in the holograph, still caught in the Matrix–to borrow a cinematic analogy. This blissed-out individual was so oblivious in his partial enlightenment the shaman was literally able to sneak up and touch him on the shoulder without his noticing anything!

It is my belief, based on study and intuition, that those focusing exclusively on the twelve principle as it applies to the development of human genetics are a little like the person having his shoulder touched. Twelve may be a sacred number in some traditions, but it must be emphasized that it is hardly the most sacred of numbers. Twelve is not even a prime number. The number 13 is far more sacred, and actually symbolizes DNA astrologically in the thirteenth sign Ophiuchus, the “Serpent Bearer” sitting nearly on top of Galactic Center in one of whose stars scientists have recently for the first time observed precursors to DNA through their telescopes. In Joy Riding the Universe Bryce writes, “Dimensional realities are either going to be systems of five or systems of twelve. A twelve dimensional reality is a clone reality … Five is an individuating number in dimensions. You were created to be individuated … A cloned reality always works off a twelve principle, all the cloned parts being orchestrated by a single, chief clone.”

In my own book on the Regenetics Method of DNA activation, Conscious Healing, I similarly define individuation as the process and result of separating from Source and achieving individual consciousness. After people individuate, it becomes possible for them to return to Source as fully realized individuals who have achieved healing and enlightenment. I further define enlightenment as the process and result of allowing the light of soul in to the point that one becomes of the light of soul. Genuine enlightenment results from healing or “wholing” through the embodiment of unity consciousness.

This really is, in my opinion, the ultimate goal of DNA activation: to assist others in becoming fully self-realized. Although this transformation can be facilitated by another person, it is ultimately the individual's responsibility to individuate–something that, I contend, cannot be achieved by agency of a guru, master, savior, or anyone else. As Jesus said in words that have often been downplayed or taken as somehow less than literal, The Kingdom of Heaven is within.

So how many strands are we looking at stimulating through the type of DNA activation that facilitates bio-spiritual transcendence in its most unlimited form? Following Bryce, I propose three strands on the way to four and eventually five. The number 3 puts us on the threshold of unity consciousness by establishing the three-in-one principle of the Sacred Trinity. The number 5 has typically been associated with the Adam Kadmon, the kabalistic name for the ultimate evolutionary stage of the human species that has also been called the lightbody.

Five also correlates beautifully with the five senses, the notion of the fivefold perfected human as in Leonardo da Vinci's Vetruvian Man, the five elements identified in traditional Chinese medicine and many traditions of alchemy, the five vowels used to speak or sing universes into being, and the five protein bases of DNA and RNA: adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine, and uracil.

There are many who believe, as I do, that Earth is in the middle of a mitosis, a quantumly powered cellular division that will soon produce two Earths. On this subject Bryce writes that you “have to choose which one you are going to live in … When a universe clones itself, it dumps off the residue that is too dense and too heavy. In the universal cloning process, the new is always bigger, brighter and more beautiful than the old … So in consciousness you're going to have to choose which nucleus you're going to ride on.”

The new Earth in Bryce's model is individuated, while the old Earth remains a holographic projection of a preconstituted reality. The old Earth becomes “multidimensional” while the other transforms into … something quite beyond dimensionality. DNA activation, which can be facilitated both internally and externally, or through personal as well as transpersonal stimuli, is one path among many to prepare ourselves for a new way of being–in one Earth or another.

Which nucleus do you want to ride on? In the end it matters not which Earth you choose since, eventually, we are all headed home. But it is nice to know there is a choice between probable futures. If you find yourself listening to the dictates of a “Spiritual Hierarchy” with an agenda of twelve, perhaps you have yet to claim your personal power as a Divine Being and, until you shift your paradigm from the co-creative to simply the creative, will go on living in a cloned reality of someone else's design.

Copyright (c) 2007 by Sol Luckman. All Rights Reserved.